Mark Zuckerberg sued native Hawaiians for their own land | AJ+

34

Watch More Direct From With Dena Takruri: http://ajplus.co/directfrom

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg used a complicated legal framework in Hawaii called “quiet title” to sue ancestral land owners and force them to sell their lands. It was all to secure his private getaway on Kauai. After Native Hawaiians protested, using his own platform, he dropped the suits. But the damage is done, as AJ+’s Dena Takruri explored in this battle of land rights in paradise.

Subscribe for more videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV3Nm3T-XAgVhKH9jT0ViRg?sub_confirmation=1

Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish

Download the AJ+ app at http://www.ajplus.net/

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajplus

source

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

34 COMMENTS

  17. I’m Polynesian and indigenous American this really pisses me off because I want to really return back to my ancestral home but I can’t because money divides us I literally cannot get America back but I have hope I can get Hawaii back

  23. Money is nothin for eich ppl to offer us thats why i want nothin from these demons no home money or mothin i rather stay in america and let this man continue to put attempts on me and my family life😢😢😢😢

  30. I can "understand" a "need" to "protect" yourself and your "family" or "friends"…..BUT,…you SHOULD NOT…..THROW OTHER GD PEOPLE WITH "FAMILY and FRIENDS"of THEIR OWN….UNDER THE GD "BUS"!!!! FOR, THEN?! "WHAT KIND" OF GD "PEOPLE" DO YOU BECOME?!?! I WOULDN'T CALL A COWARDLY "RAT" LIKE THAT….A GD "PERSON"!!!!!! NOT NOW,…..NOT EVER!!!! JUST ONE WORD COVERS THAT DEFINITION…..
    "COWARD"!!!!!!!!!!!🫤

  34. Jefferson's Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791 (from The Avalon Project by Yale Law School)
    … "I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That " all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people." [XIIth amendment.] To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.
    The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States, by the Constitution.
    1. They are not among the powers specially enumerated: for these are: 1st A power to lay taxes for the purpose of paying the debts of the United States; but no debt is paid by this bill, nor any tax laid. Were it a bill to raise money, its origination in the Senate would condemn it by the Constitution.
    2. "To borrow money." But this bill neither borrows money nor ensures the borrowing it. The proprietors of the bank will be just as free as any other money holders, to lend or not to lend their money to the public. The operation proposed in the bill first, to lend them two millions, and then to borrow them back again, cannot change the nature of the latter act, which will still be a payment, and not a loan, call it by what name you please.
    3. To "regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the States, and with the Indian tribes." To erect a bank, and to regulate commerce, are very different acts. He who erects a bank, creates a subject of commerce in its bills, so does he who makes a bushel of wheat, or digs a dollar out of the mines; yet neither of these persons regulates commerce thereby. To make a thing which may be bought and sold, is not to prescribe regulations for buying and selling. Besides, if this was an exercise of the power of regulating commerce, it would be void, as extending as much to the internal commerce of every State, as to its external. For the power given to Congress by the Constitution does not extend to the internal regulation of the commerce of a State, (that is to say of the commerce between citizen and citizen,) which remain exclusively with its own legislature; but to its external commerce only, that is to say, its commerce with another State, or with foreign nations, or with the Indian tribes. Accordingly the bill does not propose the measure as a regulation of trace, but as `' productive of considerable advantages to trade." Still less are these powers covered by any other of the special enumerations…."

    Allowing the banks to create a "Federal Reserve" is how this started. This problem is in my state, and every part of the US, and around the world, by design. Corporatism has replaced Capitalism, you and so many other media sites call it Capitalism, but it is not, it is CORPORATISM. That is what we ALL must see. No division between the people can solve this problem.

Comments are closed.