SCOTUS Conservatives SKEPTICAL Of Anti-Abortion Argument in Mifepristone Case: Interview

22

Hill court reporter Zach Schonfeld weighs in on the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing of oral arguments on mifepristone. #abortion #scotus

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV

Facebook: facebook.com/HillTVLive/

Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

source

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

22 COMMENTS

  2. Where's the decision on SC gerrymandering? Blatantly taking on a case they never should have to keep it from going into effect before the election is shameless. Same as taking on the immunity case. Of course, when it came to trump being taken off the ballot, an emergency session was a given. Maybe another yacht cruise for Thomas would help speed things up?

  4. It's the political landmine they all walk the right into. This is the issue that will makes the right and these judges relevant because the people will vote vote vote and changes these extreme position null and void period

  6. Well, if the case goes against the anti-abortion groups, I guess the Supreme Court will magically become legitimate and honorable now. That's how it works for progressives.

    The Court wasn't political and out of control when they ruled on Obergefell and Bostock, but became hopelessly political when they ruled in Dobbs. Interesting how that works for the Left.

  8. I don't support pro life groups for a few reasons.
    1) the money donated goes into politics.(Lobbyists and politicians)
    2) no standards for care because some pro life groups have different types of ideology views on what it means to be pro life different standards of care.
    3) not enough doctors. I don't trust a volunteer to do anything medical with my body. If you're volunteers outnumbered your doctor's your not helping nobody.
    3) judgmental ill pro life groups and supporters just like to talk down to people and put themselves on a pedestal it's self righteous and I don't want a thing.
    4) some pro life groups want underaged girls to be pregnant. That is nasty plain and simple.

    I myself have some pro life beliefs but the organization and groups are just too much

  12. Why doesnt this messed up government start handing out birth control to all women, maybe they wouldnt have so many abortions going on. Or give women and young girls that shot that lasts a couple years, maybe less babies would end up in dumpsters, it happens more than you know. Watch true crime.

  15. This reporter just either purposefully or unknowingly lied about the facts of this case. Even if the doctors win against the FDA and big pharma drug manufacturer, it won't ban the abortion drugs nationwide. I can't believe he just stated that as fact. What will happen is it will make the Democrat talking point of 'abortion being a consultation between a woman and her doctor' actually true again. It will bring back the pre-COVID guidelines of women going in person to see an actual doctor to get these 5 drugs, they'll have to confirm she's not being forced/coerced or trafficked, it will confirm how far along her pregnancy is (because she can't take these drugs past 10 weeks) and it will make sure she doesn't have an ectopic pregnancy (which you CAN'T take these abortion drugs for). These drugs still have a black box warning. If these drugs weren't for abortion, the media's conversation about the FDA/Big Pharma manufacturer's negligence would sound so different.

  16. This case is about a drug can it fast-track FDA approval and therefore be exempt from lawsuits if the drug turns out to be bad, that’s all this case is about

  17. Come on, it’ll be just like marajuana was 20 years ago. You’ll get it if you want it for a few dollars more. Who cares? These holier than thous actually think they can legislate morality. Laughter….

  18. STRANGE BEDFELLOWS…
    Religious Right/Physicians of Conscience (and Industry)…
    I have endorsed the concept: Our Bodies. Our Selves; for several decades, despite the fact that I find abortion in conflict with my choices; a "conflict" which has more to do with the "notion" of POTENTIAL, than Morality and/or Ethics.

    Take the Religion, Business and the Bucks out of it and one "Principle" remains:
    Woman… It ain't nobody's BUSINESS, nobody's Choice but your own. One might otherwise find oneself a captive of Ideology and a pawn to Economics.
    ✋
    One Caution: Know yourself well in this.

  20. The argument about abortion boils down to accountability. If you want to have intercourse, do so. But don't try to then negate your actions by ending the life cycle of another being. The most selfish act a person can do is expect someone else to be punished for something they didn't do. Abortion is like robbing a store and then expecting the person walking by the store front to go to jail. They had no say in the theft occurring, why should they be punished? The being created during intercourse didn't have a say in being created, why should it's life cycle be ended because someone else chose to engage in an activity?

Comments are closed.