Trump says he wants to be a “day-1 dictator”? Come Monday, Trump will be a day-1 defendant.

38

Donald Trump’s first criminal trial is set to begin on Monday in New York for Trump’s criminal attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

This video discusses what to expect in then upcoming trial, what is involved in pretrial preparation, what goes into opening statements, what considerations factor into jury selection, and more.

If you’re interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts and mission, you can becoming a Team Justice patron at:

https://www.patreon.com/glennkirschner

And you can find my audio podcast, Justice Matters, wherever you usually get your podcasts.

And my website at glennkirschner.com

Follow me on:
Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirschner2

source

38 COMMENTS

  1. Upholding the law is not "political" warfare. 🀣
    A Criminal who attempted a multi-faceted Coup on the United States Government (named: "Don the Con") has brainwashed people into thinking that when people uphold the laws, that Don the Con breaks, that Don the Con is somehow the victim of "political" warfare. 🀦
    An uneducated clown 🀑, who ignores evidence, and who knows nothing about the law, will actually believe that Don the Con's prosecutions are "political", simply because Jim Jordan (who participated in the COUP attempt by Don the Con) says so. 🀫
    There is a document used in the Court called "A Request for Admission" wherein a "party" in an adversarial proceeding (such as the "STATE") asks the other "party" (such as the Defendant) to admit what laws are laws, whether or not the person, or "Party", who broke the laws likes the laws, or not. 🀯
    The "request for admission" may be used by citizens to request that certain representatives of the "STATE" (including Judges, and Attorney Generals, and Governors, and the President, and Senators, and Congress people, and other "civil servants"), admit that laws are laws so that way when people who represent the "STATE" break the laws the representatives of the "STATE" may be held accountable, in the International Criminal Court, by the people that the "STATE" are supposed to protect from foreign, and domestic, terrorists who are now employed by the "STATE". 🫑

  2. Criminal Defendant Trump, I love it.
    VOTE BLUE SAVE AMERICA πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ and SAVE WOMENS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE CHOICESπŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™

  3. Oh Mr Kersner I can only hope and pray that you have a seat in that courtroom because there are no cameras allowed We need the truth and the whole truth and nothing but the truth for the people of the state of New York of which I was born in raised and let me tell you something that means if he didn't file his taxes like Hillary questioned back in the 2016 debate he said that makes me smart yeah okay but in the meantime you screwed average daily working people like me a single mother with a child

  4. I wish the prosecutors in this area would encourage the truth. They actively discourage the truth if it contradicts the prosecution's case and helps the defendant. I watched this happen in real-time in court. Where I live the defendant is supposed to prove their innocence. They are presumed guilty. But my state has the most corrupt "justice" system in the country..
    Trump will be unlikely to be able to keep quiet and behave so I hope if he starts talking over anyone or if he tries to walk out that he gets held in contempt and put in jail. Unfortunately, he gets away with things every other defendant would already be in jail for.

  5. Rich business men do stuff all the time, they pay for it out of petty cash, no receipts, no records. the fact that djt had to have cohen pay up front, then make payments is evidence that he's not rich. A word for djt – you were a mistake, you were elected by a fluke – you aren't important to anyone, only in your own tiny fractured mind. May you rot in jail for what you have put America thru.

  6. My husband was an expert witness for a case several years ago and the opposing attorney asked a long and seemingly convoluted question and my husband asked for the question again. The judge groaned and said, yeah, I don't understand that either. πŸ˜‚

Comments are closed.