The implications extend far beyond Trump’s fate in 2024.
Subscribe to WSJ Opinion: https://bit.ly/3PovNsz
More from WSJ Opinion:
On site: https://www.wsj.com/news/opinion
On Twitter: https://twitter.com/WSJopinion
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WSJOpinion
#WSJOpinion #WSJ
source
We don't do Opinions……! Opinions are like a$$holes…… everyone has one and they all stink…….!!!!!
Oh good trick catch to fish ?
The Supremes will delay Grump's trial which is 100% in line with Grump's objectives. The hacks want Grump to be prez again.
Ya mean Groan Up, right?
Yuk around and find out.
Attorney Sour looks like The Joker, and sounds like he has throat cancer.
I guess WSJ and Daddy Rupert are good with another Kent State incident, right?
Are you not the " press" ?? Hmmm …no, I would say the press is intelligent and circumspect, leaning towards historical evidence….you have only indicated one thing it is you are on the crazy train willing to excuse and defend anything this malevolent slob does. He has no respect for our country , its laws, its history and honor.. you , sir are an enemy of our peoples…
Consider this: forgiving student debt versus forgiving criminal fake electors/ or felony trespassers in an official government proceeding…hmmmm …ya…BIG difference dipshit s
You really want trump as your Fuhrer ?? Well good luck sphincter smoocher….IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN…❤
The "people are so hellbent " ??
Which people numn@tz ?? These are grand juries of US citizens…bow your knee sycophant ! Do it NOW !!!
Th supreme court is the only "grown up" in the room ??? You have lost all credibility…
Btw wtf is "your" definition of insurrection ??? Hmmmm …WSJ ..you are pathetic and that is putting it euphemistically…a joke more like if you pretend to serve this country…
Well either the framers meant what they said when they said " no insurrectionists shall be eligible for an official US government office " or they didn’t …which is is oh Erudite One ?
Sympathy for the supreme court ???
2:10 And lets remember he has suggested to "suspend" the constitution….be a dictator for a day…only accept the election results if "he wins"……..Lets just "suspend" decency until he has done all he can to fu$k up this country !!!
They've been "drawn into" this argument because of a sociopath "djt" that holds himself above US law and human law and for the commentators to suggest it has been uncomfortably thrown before the court to decide because of "partisan" gravity is preposterous…
No because of his criminal behavior you CLOWNS…criminals are indicted by juries not administrations…You guys are not journalists…you are clowns for the evil one…
Well now why would anyone "use" the law to prosecute trumpf ? And what is the use of LAW if not to educate, subjugate, and pontificate what our society holds as guardrails ?? Are you listening now ???
WSJ asserts that the only reason Trump is being prosecuted is to keep him out of the White House. Oh, yes, that's certainly one factor. But to ignore the outrage of millions and millions of Americans against someone who committed fraud, in conspiracy with others, to illegally change the outcome of a presidential election in order to remain in office — that's utterly partisan, and pretty stupid, too. Where is WDJ's vaunted reliance on facts and figures, on accuracy, and, formerly, on independent journalism? Pah!
What an L take.
Nine Supreme Court Justices. Six Republicans and three Democrats. How do you think that is going to turn out?
The court is clearly corrupt. This commentary is outrageous.
Trump’s attorney embarrassed himself with his arguments.
Comments are closed.